DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2016 Opel Corsa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Corsa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeOpel
MiToModelCorsa
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
180 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement999 cc
95 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
2,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
3,4 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size185/65 R15 88H; 185/70 R14 88T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4021 mm
1720 mmWidth1736 mm
1446 mmHeight1479 mm
1150 KgWeight1088 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2016 Opel Corsa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Corsa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…