DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2016 Ford B-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford B-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeFord
MiToModelB-Max
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
180 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement999 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
200 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank48 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
2,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
3,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R16Tyre size195/60 R15; 195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4077 mm
1720 mmWidth1751 mm
1446 mmHeight1604 mm
1150 KgWeight1199 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2489 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2016 Ford B-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford B-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…