DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chrysler 300M vs 2003 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeHolden
300MModelFrontera
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
210 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement3165 cc
203 HPPower205 HP
258 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption17 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,1 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5000 mmLength4680 mm
1920 mmWidth1785 mm
1420 mmHeight1690 mm
1610 KgWeight1785 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chrysler 300M and 2003 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…