DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chrysler Concorde vs 2003 Chrysler 300M Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeChrysler
ConcordeModel300M
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
187 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
258 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
—Average consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength5000 mm
1900 mmWidth1920 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
1570 KgWeight1610 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chrysler Concorde and 2003 Chrysler 300M approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…