DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden Frontera vs 2003 Chrysler 300M Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChrysler
FronteraModel300M
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
192 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
205 HPPower203 HP
290 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank64 lt
17 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
—Average consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength5000 mm
1785 mmWidth1920 mm
1690 mmHeight1420 mm
1785 KgWeight1610 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden Frontera and 2003 Chrysler 300M approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…