DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lexus RX vs 2003 Chrysler 300M Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeChrysler
RXModel300M
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
201 HPPower203 HP
283 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank64 lt
17,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
13 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4580 mmLength5000 mm
1815 mmWidth1920 mm
1660 mmHeight1420 mm
1800 KgWeight1610 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lexus RX and 2003 Chrysler 300M approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…