DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chrysler 300M vs 2003 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeChrysler
300MModelConcorde
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
210 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
258 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R17Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5000 mmLength5310 mm
1920 mmWidth1900 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
1610 KgWeight1570 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chrysler 300M and 2003 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…