DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMitsubishi
CaptivaModelLancer
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
167 HPPower148 HP
230 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank59 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R18Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4625 mm
1849 mmWidth1760 mm
1756 mmHeight1480-1505 mm
—Weight1310 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chevrolet Captiva and 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…