DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2016 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChevrolet
ASXModelCaptiva
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
147 HPPower167 HP
360 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17 96HTyre size235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4673 mm
1770 mmWidth1849 mm
1615 mmHeight1756 mm
1520 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi ASX and 2016 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…