DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChevrolet
LancerModelCaptiva
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
148 HPPower167 HP
197 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4625 mmLength4673 mm
1760 mmWidth1849 mm
1480-1505 mmHeight1756 mm
1310 KgWeight—
2635 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2016 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…