DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2000 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolkswagen
166ModelBora
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
202 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2324 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
304 NmTorque205 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption14 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16WTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4376 mm
1815 mmWidth1735 mm
1416 mmHeight1446 mm
1490 KgWeight1302 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2000 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…