DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW 7 Serisi vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeAlfa Romeo
7 SerisiModel166
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
206 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
143 HPPower136 HP
280 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
85 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4984 mmLength4720 mm
1862 mmWidth1815 mm
1435 mmHeight1416 mm
1710 KgWeight1490 Kg
2930 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW 7 Serisi and 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…