DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan R Nessa vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan R Nessa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAlfa Romeo
R NessaModel166
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
152 HPPower136 HP
209 NmTorque304 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption9,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4720 mm
1765 mmWidth1815 mm
1640 mmHeight1416 mm
1630 KgWeight1490 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan R Nessa and 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan R Nessa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…