DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeSaab
166Model9-3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
202 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
304 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank68 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16WTyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4629 mm
1815 mmWidth1711 mm
1416 mmHeight1428 mm
1490 KgWeight1320 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…