DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2000 Nissan R Nessa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan R Nessa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeNissan
166ModelR Nessa
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
136 HPPower152 HP
304 NmTorque209 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
205/55 R16WTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4680 mm
1815 mmWidth1765 mm
1416 mmHeight1640 mm
1490 KgWeight1630 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2000 Nissan R Nessa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan R Nessa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…