DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Caterham 21 vs 1996 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeMazda
21ModelCronos
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
153 HPPower140 HP
180 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4695 mm
1580 mmWidth1770 mm
1150 mmHeight1400 mm
650 KgWeight1170 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Caterham 21 and 1996 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…