1996 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 1.8i V6 24V (140 Hp) 1996Overall Score62.25/100
1996 Mazda Cronos vs 1996 Caterham 21 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Caterham
21
Caterham 21 1.8 i 16V U347WC (153 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CronosSpecificationCaterham 21
MazdaMakeCaterham
CronosModel21
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Mazda CronosSpecificationCaterham 21
—0–100 km/h5,3 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
140 HPPower153 HP
157 NmTorque180 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CronosSpecificationCaterham 21
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CronosSpecificationCaterham 21
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R14 89 STyre size205/45 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CronosSpecificationCaterham 21
4695 mmLength3800 mm
1770 mmWidth1580 mm
1400 mmHeight1150 mm
1170 KgWeight650 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Cronos and 1996 Caterham 21 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…