DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Sm-x vs 1996 Caterham 21 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Sm-x

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeCaterham
Sm-xModel21
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,3 s
160 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
140 HPPower153 HP
186 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank66 lt
8,62 ltUrban consumption—
5,35 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size205/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3935 mmLength3800 mm
1695 mmWidth1580 mm
1735 mmHeight1150 mm
1370 KgWeight650 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Sm-x and 1996 Caterham 21 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Sm-x leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…