DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2003 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeVolvo
CTSModelS80
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
223 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2597 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
181 HPPower210 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption13 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4822 mm
1795 mmWidth1832 mm
1441 mmHeight1434 mm
1625 KgWeight1530 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…