DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2003 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCadillac
GalantModelCTS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
215 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2597 cc
163 HPPower181 HP
218 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4828 mm
—Width1795 mm
—Height1441 mm
1480 KgWeight1625 Kg
—Wheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Galant and 2003 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…