2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.5 V6 (176 Hp) 2003Overall Score71.5/100
2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Cadillac CTS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Cadillac
CTS
Cadillac CTS 2.6i V6 24V L (181 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationCadillac CTS
KiaMakeCadillac
OptimaModelCTS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationCadillac CTS
—0–100 km/h9,3 s
209 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2597 cc
176 HPPower181 HP
229 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationCadillac CTS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationCadillac CTS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationCadillac CTS
4745 mmLength4828 mm
1815 mmWidth1795 mm
1420 mmHeight1441 mm
1450 KgWeight1625 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…