DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2003 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeKia
CTSModelOptima
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
223 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2597 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
181 HPPower176 HP
245 NmTorque229 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4745 mm
1795 mmWidth1815 mm
1441 mmHeight1420 mm
1625 KgWeight1450 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…