DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volvo XC90 vs 2006 Buick Rainer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Rainer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeBuick
XC90ModelRainer
2011Model year2006
SUVBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed175 km/h
4414 ccEngine displacement4157 cc
315 HPPower279 HP
440 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank83 lt
19,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt
13,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears4
—Tyre size255/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4798 mmLength4871 mm
1898 mmWidth1894 mm
1743 mmHeight1894 mm
2080 KgWeight2150 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2869 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volvo XC90 and 2006 Buick Rainer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Rainer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…