DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Buick Rainer vs 2011 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Rainer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeVolvo
RainerModelXC90
2006Model year2011
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
175 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4157 ccEngine displacement4414 cc
279 HPPower315 HP
373 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption19,8 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
—Average consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears6
255/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4798 mm
1894 mmWidth1898 mm
1894 mmHeight1743 mm
2150 KgWeight2080 Kg
2869 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Buick Rainer and 2011 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Rainer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…