DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 GMC Yukon vs 2011 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMC YukonSpecificationVolvo XC90
GMCMakeVolvo
YukonModelXC90
2006Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

GMC YukonSpecificationVolvo XC90
—0–100 km/h7,3 s
156 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4807 ccEngine displacement4414 cc
278 HPPower315 HP
393 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

GMC YukonSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption19,8 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
—Average consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GMC YukonSpecificationVolvo XC90
4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears6
245/75 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GMC YukonSpecificationVolvo XC90
5029 mmLength4798 mm
2004 mmWidth1898 mm
1943 mmHeight1743 mm
2350 KgWeight2080 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 GMC Yukon and 2011 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…