DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volvo XC90 vs 2008 Isuzu Ascender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu Ascender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeIsuzu
XC90ModelAscender
2011Model year2008
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed175 km/h
4414 ccEngine displacement4157 cc
315 HPPower279 HP
440 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank95 lt
19,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
13,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4798 mmLength5273 mm
1898 mmWidth1933 mm
1743 mmHeight1918 mm
2080 KgWeight2245 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase3277 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volvo XC90 and 2008 Isuzu Ascender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu Ascender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…