DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 Subaru Outback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Outback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSubaru
XC90ModelOutback
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
0 km/hTop speed224 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement3000 cc
243 HPPower245 HP
320 NmTorque297 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank64 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption13,4 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4730 mm
1936 mmWidth1770 mm
1784 mmHeight1545 mm
2218 KgWeight1545 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo XC90 and 2004 Subaru Outback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…