DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo GT vs 2005 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
GTModelXC90
2004Model year2005
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
243 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3179 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
240 HPPower243 HP
289 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
18,6 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4480 mmLength4807 mm
1760 mmWidth1936 mm
1390 mmHeight1784 mm
1410 KgWeight2218 Kg
2596 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo GT and 2005 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…