DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2005 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
166ModelXC90
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
245 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3179 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
240 HPPower243 HP
289 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
18,3 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4807 mm
1800 mmWidth1936 mm
1416 mmHeight1784 mm
1540 KgWeight2218 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2005 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…