DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo XC90 vs 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo Spider

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeAlfa Romeo
XC90ModelSpider
2005Model year2003
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
0 km/hTop speed242 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
243 HPPower240 HP
320 NmTorque289 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption19,9 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4285 mm
1936 mmWidth1780 mm
1784 mmHeight1315 mm
2218 KgWeight1470 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo XC90 and 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo Spider leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…