DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC90 vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo C30
VolvoMakeVolvo
XC90ModelC30
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCoupe
7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo C30
11,5 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
185 HPPower177 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo C30
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo C30
4798 mmLength4266 mm
1898 mmWidth1782 mm
1743 mmHeight1447 mm
2080 KgWeight1451 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC90 and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…