DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jeep Compass vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeVolvo
CompassModelXC90
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
201 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
163 HPPower185 HP
320 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength4798 mm
1812 mmWidth1898 mm
1718 mmHeight1743 mm
1680 KgWeight2080 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jeep Compass and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…