DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo XC90
VolvoMakeVolvo
C30ModelXC90
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSUV
5Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo XC90
8,6 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
177 HPPower185 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo XC90
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo XC90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo XC90
4266 mmLength4798 mm
1782 mmWidth1898 mm
1447 mmHeight1743 mm
1451 KgWeight2080 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…