DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo XC90 vs 2002 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 626
VolvoMakeMazda
XC90Model626
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 626
12,3 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
185 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
163 HPPower167 HP
340 NmTorque218 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank64 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 626
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 626
4800 mmLength4745 mm
1890 mmWidth1760 mm
1740 mmHeight1425 mm
2095 KgWeight1425 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo XC90 and 2002 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…