DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 626 vs 2002 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo XC90
MazdaMakeVolvo
626ModelXC90
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo XC90
9,3 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
198 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
167 HPPower163 HP
218 NmTorque340 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo XC90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo XC90
4745 mmLength4800 mm
1760 mmWidth1890 mm
1425 mmHeight1740 mm
1425 KgWeight2095 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 626 and 2002 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…