2002 • Nissan
Altima
Nissan Altima 2.4 16V (152 Hp) 2002Overall Score63.25/100
2002 Nissan Altima vs 2002 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.4 TDi (163 Hp) 2002Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Altima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan AltimaSpecificationVolvo XC90
NissanMakeVolvo
AltimaModelXC90
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan AltimaSpecificationVolvo XC90
8,2 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
152 HPPower163 HP
209 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan AltimaSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan AltimaSpecificationVolvo XC90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan AltimaSpecificationVolvo XC90
4660 mmLength4800 mm
1760 mmWidth1890 mm
1420 mmHeight1740 mm
1325 KgWeight2095 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2860 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Altima and 2002 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…