DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo XC90 vs 2002 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFord
XC90ModelContour
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
185 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2544 cc
163 HPPower197 HP
340 NmTorque265 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size205/55 ZR 16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4670 mm
1890 mmWidth1755 mm
1740 mmHeight1385 mm
2095 KgWeight1400 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo XC90 and 2002 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…