DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC90 vs 2012 BMW Z4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
VolvoMakeBMW
XC90ModelZ4
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5/7Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
10,3 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
205 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
200 HPPower184 HP
420 NmTorque270 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/45 R17 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
4807 mmLength4239 mm
1936 mmWidth1790 mm
1784 mmHeight1291 mm
2196 KgWeight1470 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2496 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC90 and 2012 BMW Z4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…