DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 BMW Z4 vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC90
BMWMakeVolvo
Z4ModelXC90
2012Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC90
6,9 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
235 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
184 HPPower200 HP
270 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank68 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/45 R17 WTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC90
4239 mmLength4807 mm
1790 mmWidth1936 mm
1291 mmHeight1784 mm
1470 KgWeight2196 Kg
2496 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 BMW Z4 and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…