DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Altima vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Altima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
AltimaModelXC90
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,3 s
235 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
177 HPPower200 HP
244 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4807 mm
1796 mmWidth1936 mm
1471 mmHeight1784 mm
—Weight2196 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Altima and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…