DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC90 vs 2012 Nissan Altima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Altima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeNissan
XC90ModelAltima
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCoupe
5/7Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
200 HPPower177 HP
420 NmTorque244 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank76 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4636 mm
1936 mmWidth1796 mm
1784 mmHeight1405 mm
2196 KgWeight1405 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC90 and 2012 Nissan Altima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…