DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo XC90 vs 2002 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S80
VolvoMakeVolvo
XC90ModelS80
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S80
11,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
163 HPPower140 HP
340 NmTorque220 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S80
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S80
4807 mmLength4822 mm
1936 mmWidth1832 mm
1784 mmHeight1434 mm
2141 KgWeight1490 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo XC90 and 2002 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…