DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chrysler Voyager vs 2002 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Voyager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeVolvo
VoyagerModelXC90
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
143 HPPower163 HP
320 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank68 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4807 mm
1995 mmWidth1936 mm
1750 mmHeight1784 mm
1850 KgWeight2141 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chrysler Voyager and 2002 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Voyager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…