2002 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.4 20V (140 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
2002 Volvo S60 vs 2002 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.4 D3 (163 Hp) 2002Overall Score58.75/100
WINNER
Volvo S60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationVolvo XC90
VolvoMakeVolvo
S60ModelXC90
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationVolvo XC90
10,2 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
140 HPPower163 HP
220 NmTorque340 Nm
5Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S60SpecificationVolvo XC90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationVolvo XC90
4576 mmLength4807 mm
1804 mmWidth1936 mm
1428 mmHeight1784 mm
1501 KgWeight2141 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2857 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Volvo S60 and 2002 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…