DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo XC90 vs 2002 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S60
VolvoMakeVolvo
XC90ModelS60
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S60
11,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
163 HPPower140 HP
340 NmTorque220 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S60
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S60
4807 mmLength4576 mm
1936 mmWidth1804 mm
1784 mmHeight1428 mm
2141 KgWeight1501 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo XC90 and 2002 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…