2017 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.0 T5 (254 Hp) 2017Overall Score80.75/100
2017 Volvo XC90 vs 2016 Borgward BX6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Borgward
BX6
Borgward BX6 2.0 (224 Hp) 2016Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Borgward BX6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC90SpecificationBorgward BX6
VolvoMakeBorgward
XC90ModelBX6
2017Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo XC90SpecificationBorgward BX6
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1981 cc
254 HPPower224 HP
350 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC90SpecificationBorgward BX6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC90SpecificationBorgward BX6
4950 mmLength4490 mm
—Width1870 mm
1776 mmHeight1649 mm
2984 mmWheelbase2685 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Volvo XC90 and 2016 Borgward BX6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Borgward BX6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Image unavailableVSImage unavailableLexus GS vs Volvo XC902017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableBorgward BX7 vs Volvo XC902017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableKTM X-Bow vs Volvo XC902016 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMG HS vs Volvo XC902018 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableBorgward BX6 vs Volvo XC902016 and 2017 model years
Comments are loading…