DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 MG HS vs 2017 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG HS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG HSSpecificationVolvo XC90
MGMakeVolvo
HSModelXC90
2018Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

MG HSSpecificationVolvo XC90
—0–100 km/h8,2 s
210 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
231 HPPower254 HP
360 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG HSSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank71 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG HSSpecificationVolvo XC90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 DCTGears8
235/50 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG HSSpecificationVolvo XC90
4574 mmLength4950 mm
1876 mmWidth—
1664 mmHeight1776 mm
1630 KgWeight—
2720 mmWheelbase2984 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 MG HS and 2017 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG HS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…