DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 KTM X-Bow vs 2017 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC90
KTMMakeVolvo
X-BowModelXC90
2016Model year2017
RoadsterBody typeSUV
2Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC90
3,9 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
220 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
240 HPPower254 HP
310 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank71 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC90
3738 mmLength4950 mm
1915 mmWidth—
1202 mmHeight1776 mm
790 KgWeight—
2430 mmWheelbase2984 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 KTM X-Bow and 2017 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…