DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC60 vs 2012 Chrysler Voyager Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Voyager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChrysler
XC60ModelVoyager
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement3301 cc
243 HPPower174 HP
320 NmTorque278 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4627 mmLength4808 mm
1891 mmWidth1997 mm
1713 mmHeight1803 mm
1810 KgWeight—
2774 mmWheelbase2878 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC60 and 2012 Chrysler Voyager approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Voyager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…