DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chrysler Voyager vs 2012 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Voyager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeVolvo
VoyagerModelXC60
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3301 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
174 HPPower243 HP
278 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4808 mmLength4627 mm
1997 mmWidth1891 mm
1803 mmHeight1713 mm
—Weight1810 Kg
2878 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chrysler Voyager and 2012 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Voyager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…